Schenck v. United States

U.S. Case Law

Legal Definition of Schenck v. United States

249 U.S. 47 (1919), subverted the apparent absolute nature of First Amendment protections of freedom of speech by establishing a “clear and present danger” test by which certain forms of incendiary speech become prosecutable. The case involved two New York Socialists who were convicted under the Espionage Act of 1917 for distributing handbills urging resistance to military conscription during World War I. The two appealed on First Amendment grounds to the Supreme Court, but Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., writing for the Court, rejected their arguments and declared that “the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic. [The] question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.” (see also Gitlow v. New York and Yates v. United States)

Learn More About Schenck v. United States

Dictionary Entries Near Schenck v. United States


Schenck v. United States


See More Nearby Entries 

Cite this Entry

“Schenck v. United States.” Legal Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, Accessed 17 Oct. 2021.

Style: MLA
MLACheck Mark Icon ChicagoCheck Mark Icon APACheck Mark Icon Merriam-WebsterCheck Mark Icon


Test Your Vocabulary

Dog Words Quiz

  • shiba puppy more or less demanding cuddles
  • Which of the following animals has a dog in its etymology?
Name That Thing

Test your visual vocabulary with our 10-question challenge!

Love words? Need even more definitions?

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!