International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonU.S. Case Law
Legal Definition of International Shoe Co. v. Washington
326 U.S. 310 (1945), expanded states' powers to claim jurisdiction over out-of-state parties. Prior to the ruling, states often could not establish jurisdiction (in personam jurisdiction) over outside parties, even when such parties could be shown to have contracted with or tortiously injured a state or its citizens. The Supreme Court held that when such “minimum contacts” are maintained with a state, notions of fair play and substantial justice require that the contacting party be made subject to that state's laws. Following the decision many states enacted “long-arm” statutes that extended their power to apply in personam jurisdiction. In Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977), the Court applied the same “minimum contacts” standard to cases involving questions of in rem (property) and quasi in rem (intangible property) jurisdiction.
Love words? Need even more definitions?Merriam-Webster unabridged
Words at Play
“In Vino Veritas” and Other Latin Phrases to Live By
Top 10 Latin Phrases
Word of the Year 2021 | Vaccine
Our Word of the Year 'vaccine,' plus 10 more
Merriam-Webster's Words of the Week - Nov. 26
From the week ending 11/26/2021
What's the Past Tense of 'Green-light'?
Is the project green-lighted? Or greenlit?
Ask the Editors