Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia

U.S. Case Law

Legal Definition of Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia

448 U.S. 555 (1980), affirmed the public's and the press's constitutional right to attend criminal trials. The decision overturned a state court ruling that the publicity surrounding a murder case then entering a fourth trial (because of a series of mistrials and reversals) justified the exclusion from the court of members of the press and the public. The Supreme Court ruled that only when a defendant's right to a fair trial is demonstrably threatened, and there is no alternative to closure, can a trial take place beyond the view of the public. One year later, in Chandler v. Florida, 449 U.S. 560 (1981), the Court allowed that press access to trials may include television coverage, but cautioned in a subsequent case Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596 (1982), that tighter restrictions may apply in the case of minors.

Learn More about Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia

Cite this Entry

“Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia.” Legal Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, Accessed 25 Sep. 2020.

Comments on Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia

What made you want to look up Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible).


Test Your Vocabulary

Homophone Quiz

  • three bears two of them look like theyre whispering to a third bear who looks chuffed to be the center of attention
  • In order to judge how people felt, the senator's office hired a firm to take a ______.
Spell It

Can you spell these 10 commonly misspelled words?

Syn City

Test Your Knowledge - and learn some interesting things along the way.

Love words? Need even more definitions?

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!