Law Dictionary

Near v. Minnesota

U.S. Case Law

legal Definition of Near v. Minnesota

382 U.S. 679 (1931), ruled that a state law prohibiting publication of a newspaper that prints malicious or defamatory articles constitutes prior restraint of the press in violation of First Amendment guarantees. This was the first, and one of the most important, prior restraint cases to be heard by the Court. In a sharply divided opinion (5–4), the justices invalidated a Minnesota gag rule that was applied against a local practitioner of yellow journalism. Two weeks before, in Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931), the Court had struck down as an unconstitutional ban on free speech a California law prohibiting the display of a red flag that symbolized Communist opposition to government.

Seen and Heard

What made you want to look up Near v. Minnesota? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible).

Love words? Need even more definitions?

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

WORD OF THE DAY

marked by intense feeling

Get Word of the Day daily email!

Love words? Need even more definitions?

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!