Miranda v. Arizona

U.S. Case Law

Legal Definition of Miranda v. Arizona

384 U.S. 436 (1966), specified a code of conduct for police interrogations of criminal suspects held in custody. Known as the Miranda warnings, these guidelines include informing arrested persons prior to questioning that they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used against them, and that they have the right to the counsel of an attorney. Ernesto Miranda had been convicted on serious charges after having signed a confession without first being told his rights. The Court held that the prosecution could not use his statements unless the police had complied with several procedural safeguards to guarantee his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The 5–4 Miranda decision shocked the law enforcement community and was hotly debated. Several later decisions by a more conservative court served to limit the scope of the Miranda safeguards.

Learn More About Miranda v. Arizona

Dictionary Entries Near Miranda v. Arizona

Miranda rights

Miranda v. Arizona

Miranda warnings

See More Nearby Entries 

Cite this Entry

“Miranda v. Arizona.” Merriam-Webster.com Legal Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/Miranda%20v.%20Arizona. Accessed 17 Aug. 2022.

Style: MLA
MLACheck Mark Icon ChicagoCheck Mark Icon APACheck Mark Icon Merriam-WebsterCheck Mark Icon

WORD OF THE DAY

Test Your Vocabulary

Words Named After People

  • name tags
  • Namesake of the leotard, Jules Léotard had what profession?
Name That Thing

Test your visual vocabulary with our 10-question challenge!

TAKE THE QUIZ
Universal Daily Crossword

A daily challenge for crossword fanatics.

TAKE THE QUIZ
Love words? Need even more definitions?

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!