How does a word get into a Merriam-Webster dictionary?
This is one of the questions Merriam-Webster editors are most often asked.
The answer is simple: usage.
Tracking Word Usage
To decide which words to include in the dictionary and to determine what they mean, Merriam-Webster editors study
the language as it's used. They carefully monitor which words people use most often and how they use them.
Each day most Merriam-Webster editors devote an hour or two to reading a cross section of published material,
including books, newspapers, magazines, and electronic publications; in our office this activity is called "reading
and marking." The editors scour the texts in search of new words, new usages of existing words, variant spellings,
and inflected formsin short, anything that might help in deciding if a word belongs in the dictionary, understanding
what it means, and determining typical usage. Any word of interest is marked, along with surrounding context that
offers insight into its form and use.
The marked passages are then input into a computer system and stored both in machine-readable form and on 3" x 5"
slips of paper to create citations.
Each citation has the following elements:
the word itself
an example of the word used in context
bibliographic information about the source from which the word and example were taken
Merriam-Webster's citation files, which were begun in the 1880s, now contain 15.7 million examples of words used in
context and cover all aspects of the English vocabulary. Citations are also available to editors in a searchable text
database (linguists call it a corpus) that includes more than 70 million words drawn from a great
variety of sources.
From Citation to Entry
How does a word make the jump from the citation file to the dictionary?
The process begins with dictionary editors reviewing groups of citations. Definers start by looking at citations
covering a relatively small segment of the alphabet for example gri- to gro- along with the entries from the dictionary being reedited that are included within
that alphabetical section. It is the definer's job to determine which existing entries can remain essentially unchanged,
which entries need to be revised, which entries can be dropped, and which new entries should be added. In each case,
the definer decides on the best course of action by reading through the citations and using the evidence in them to
adjust entries or create new ones.
Before a new word can be added to the dictionary, it must have enough citations to show that it is widely used. But
having a lot of citations is not enough; in fact, a large number of citations might even make a word more difficult
to define, because many citations show too little about the meaning of a word to be helpful. A word may be rejected
for entry into a general dictionary if all of its citations come from a single source or if they are all from
highly specialized publications that reflect the jargon of experts within a single field.
To be included in a Merriam-Webster dictionary, a word must be used in a substantial number of citations that come
from a wide range of publications over a considerable period of time. Specifically, the word must have enough citations
to allow accurate judgments about its establishment, currency, and meaning.
The number and range of citations needed to add a word to the dictionary varies. In rare cases, a word jumps onto
the scene and is both instantly prevalent and likely to last, as was the case in the 1980s with AIDS. In such a situation, the editors determine that the word has become firmly established
in a relatively short time and should be entered in the dictionary, even though its citations may not span the wide
range of years exhibited by other words.
Size Does Matter
The size and type of dictionary also affects how many citations a word needs to gain admission. Because an
abridged dictionary, such as Merriam-Webster's Collegiate® Dictionary, has fairly
limited space, only the most commonly used words can be entered; to get into that type of dictionary, a word must
be supported by a significant number of citations. But a large unabridged dictionary, such as Webster's
Third New International Dictionary, has room for many more words, so terms with fewer citations can
still be included.
Authority Without Authoritarianism
Change and variation are as natural in language as they are in other areas of human life and Merriam-Webster
reference works must reflect that fact. By relying on citational evidence, we hope to keep our publications grounded
in the details of current usage so they can calmly and dispassionately offer information about modern English. That
way, our references can speak with authority without being authoritarian.